You could always take the easy way out and set up a proxy cache, which will take care of the NAT and add some security if you need it?

On 8/24/2011 6:08 AM, Riegert, Timothy J. wrote:

IIRC, the use of the CAS as a NAT gateway is only permitted for testing use as it has limited number of connections.

 

Typically, if you’re doing a L3 / OOB / real IP solution, you utilize policy-based routing to send the traffic through the CAS, and you would have to perform NAT on a device that is further upstream (towards the Internet).

 

From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Allen, Richard D CW2 NG NG NGB
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 12:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Configuration question (UNCLASSIFIED)

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Here is one for all you smart NAC admins –

 

I am working on setting up layer 3 OOB real IP gateway and have everything working except one part. My network uses public IP addresses (military) and thus no NAT’ing is configured on the network. My un-auth VLAN is set as a 192.168.x.x network and thus has no way to access the internet for remediation.

 

My question is – should internet traffic be flowing through the CAS and be using the trusted IP address of the CAS or is it simply passed on with the IP address of the un-auth network? And if so, what is the easiest way to allow unauthorized network traffic limited access to the internet?

 

 

Richard Allen

CW2, SC, TNARNG

J6 JFHQ

3041 Sidco Drive

Nashville, TN 37204

Comm: 615-313-7522

DSN 683-7522

 

 


Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE



--

Bruce Hodge

Team Leader Networks and Communications Group
IT Services
The University of Newcastle, Australia
Phone:            +61 2 492 15563
Fax:                +61 2 492 16910
Email:             [email protected]
Mobile:           0408 610 293
IT Support:     +61 2 492 17000

http://www.newcastle.edu.au/unit/it
CRICOS Provider Number: 00109J

    

Reply via email to