It's a while since I've last been using hudson, I remember it having some features that I was missing in continuum. The only problem I had was the rich webinterface occasionally crashing firefox, but I suppose that's fixed by now so I'm fine with hudson.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]>wrote: > my personal preference for continuous integration is for Hudson, but no > problem on using Continuum. > Tommaso > > 2009/12/11 Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> > > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Tsuyoshi Ito <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > ...Have we made a decision about the continuous integration > > infratstructure? > > > Should we use hudson or continuum? We have used continuum so far but I > > have > > > no problem with hudson.... > > > > In Sling we are using hudson because at the time we decided, the > > Apache continuum server was often overloaded and slow. I don't know if > > that's still the case. > > > > -Bertrand > > >
