Very good point sir. I also would like to add, that Trialox launched a Open Source Web CMS based on Apache Clerezza and therefore is even closer to FOO.
Another thing is the differentation to the Apache UIMA/TIKA projects as it seems that FOO actually is a mixture of Clerezza/UIMA/TIKA and some more components. @Bertrand: As you seem to be the main architect behind this initiative I'm wondering how you see the coexistence of those Apache projects. Could FOO not just be a Subproject of Clerezza as FOO already use main components of Clerezza? Just wondering -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Reto Bachmann-Gmuer Sent: Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010 14:13 To: [email protected] Subject: FOO proposal and Clerezza Hello You probabbly have already seen the FOO proposal ( http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FOOproposal). The goal ("a modular software stack and reusable set of components for semantic content management") seems quite similar to the one of Clerezza ("an OSGi-based modular application and set of components (bundles) for building RESTFul Semantic Web applications and services."). Since several people are involved in both project, I'm curios on how the two projects goals or approaches differ, FOO is for Semantic Content Management, Clerezza for Semantic Web Application. Is there really a difference (taking into account how Celrezza isn't just focuses on the web presentation layers but on the whole stack)? Cheers, Reto
