Hi Henry I don't see the advantage of your proposed CLEREZZA-600 issue and its resolution (commit 1144670). I think it is usefull to distinguish between the import of the classes in the package and importing the (implicit) methods and I thus don't think its a goof a idea to rename the Preamble object to package.
I'm not strongly against it as I know little about the motivation, there is also the other idea I recently suggested to remove Preamble (object and class) to EzGraph. I'll move your patch to an issue branch for a better basis to discuss multiple alternatives. Cheers, Reto
