Thanks for clarification, Ross. I enhanced the entry with a reference to Domeo and the the suggestions regarding the community development entry.
Does anyone else have a suggestion or information we could add? Daniel On 31 January 2012 17:37, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31 January 2012 16:22, Daniel Spicar <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that the point should be written differently. However I don't > want > > to write something the others don't agree with. Can we reach a consensus > > that we will come up with a plan on how to grow the community for the > next > > report or should I remove the entry until we're ready to make a > commitment > > in that direction? > > It is a condition of being in the Incubator that projects seek to > build a community, that's what the incubator is for. So consensus was > already reached when you entered (and you had it in your draft report > in the form of "3. Grow community." There is a drive in the Incubator > to ensure projects have a plan as to how they are going to grow their > community. This plan need not be grand, just 3-5 key concrete > activities that will contribute to community health/ > > Given the short time available for creating such a plan for this > report I'm happy to sign off with an acknowledgement of the need to > discuss this for the next report. However, removing the intent to > "grow community" will likely be more detrimental to your report than > not including my suggestion. > > Ross >
