Hi Hasan, why then not keep Clerezza where it is and try to bring up more community around it? The only point why this discussion came up is that from the outside it seems that there is to low activity in Clerezza. If this can be changed, we are just fine.
Best, - Fabian 2012/11/8 Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> > Hi All, > > we from trialox are thinking of cloning the whole apache clerezza modules > and hosting them elsewhere, probably under > github and make them available as open source, however using the name > org.clerezza (thus, all artifacts will be renamed) > We will maintain the codes and people may make suggestions for improvements > or provide patches which will be applied if suitable. > > Kind regards > Hasan > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ...It's good to have the existing released artifacts remain - what > about > > after > > > the donation? > > > > > > Presumably the moved modules will be released by the new host - will > they > > > use group id org.apache.clerezza? or move to the new host project group > > id? > > > I'd suggest renaming the group to the new project but realise it is a > bit > > > more disruptive... > > > > I think that's really up to whatever project adopts that code. In > > theory package names should change but that's probably not convenient. > > > > Or maybe it's time to create a semantic module or two at > > http://commons.apache.org/ ? If existing committers are willing to > > support that with their work it should be easy to make it happen. > > > > -Bertrand > > > -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
