[embarrassement] I managed to send this to a bogus address on Sunday night. So, second try, and an update.
First, 64-bit flex failed when my script tried to 'touch doc/flex.1' - there was a '21933 Killed' message. Fortunately, that instruction is no longer in the book and flex built fine without it. Then I got to bash in the final system: That fails as soon as make begins: config.status: creating po/Makefile config.status: executing default commands bison -y -d ./parse.y conflicts: 1 shift/reduce touch parser-built make: *** [y.tab.c] Killed # <<<<<<<<< make: *** Deleting file `y.tab.c' I don't see anything odd in my script, but by that point I was feeling uneasy about the whole build. After I'd mis-sent the original mail, I decided to plough on by not building bash. The testsuite for module-init-tools failed with a 'Killed', everything else was ok, but since it couldn't build bash, I trashed it. [ I also tried compiling a static bash on the 64-bit host, then rebuilding coreutils and bison, but no different. ] Now, I'm trying a fresh build with gcc-4.2.0 (and without the extras for bash's config.cache in the temporary system). This has managed to rebuild coreutils for 'df'. (Yes, I know I should use what Joe pointed out, but I'd like to get to the bottom of the problem first), also glibc in the final system, and is currently bootstrapping gcc. At the moment, I'm wondering if 4.2.1 miscompiles glibc on x86_64. If the base system builds, I want to update my multilib desktop, so it could all end in tears based on the bug report Joe pointed to. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
