On 04/16/2011 02:03 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote:
I just reviewed this patch. I agree there is an issue, but this patch
does not appear to be a good solution. It may run the checks that need
to run, but it also caused the value of CC to be defaulted. It dropped
some additional parameters I had set. I am going to look for an
alternative solution. Reading through that email thread, it looks like
setting EGREP=egrep is enough.
Thanks for bringing the issue up.
Sure sure. Just out of curiosity, what was dropped? Also, it seems to me
that I had lost something else had changed without running the whole
script. Maybe another mistak, but I can't see why I would have used the
patch if setting EGREP would have worked for me. I am a far cry from
either CLFS or LFS, so a simple CC="gcc -m32" with the patch worked as
expected in my case.
-- DJ Lucas
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
