On Apr 30, 2012, at 15:40 PM, Martin Ward wrote:
On 30/04/12 20:59, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 07:00 AM, Martin Ward wrote:
Hi
First of all thanks for the continued updates to CLFS.
Some observations and typos on the current build.
1. The date is wrong, surely should be GIT-20120415 ?
2. 5.14. Cross Binutils-2.22
why? --with-cloog=/cross-tools --enable-cloog-backend=isl,
surely binutils doesn't do graphite optimisation, I could
understand this if binutils was built at the same time as gcc,
under the same tree, but it doesn't make sense to me.
3. 6.9. Binutils-2.22
ditto as above --with-ppl=/tools --with-cloog=/tools --enable-
cloog-backend=isl
7. 10.15. Binutils-2.22
ditto item 2
cheers
Martin
Hello Martin. http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-02/
msg00224.html Hmmmmm maybe we will rectify that, then. When we
were talking about it, I may have asked Cosmo to do that when
really we shouldn't be doing that. I was the one messing with
cloog isl backend to get it into the book.
Sincerely,
William
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
Thanks, I think the message was the one I saw as well, looks
familiar!
Incidentally, I build with a separate isl package available here
http://www.kotnet.org/~skimo/isl/
martin
Current cloog isl uses 0.08. Wouldn't be hard to use the latest isl.
Also, ppl 0.12 will be well. Also I build using cloog 0.17 and it
has openscop, as well. What is lacking is the documentation in the
CLFS build system to use them. For my builds I use -floop-block -
floop-interchange -floop-strip-mine -fgraphite-identity -floop-
parallelize-all We have a graphite toolchain but it isn't being
utilized. MPFR 3.2 will be released soon, and the tree is looking
well. Any comments about the next step to cloog 0.17 and ppl 0.12?
-William
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
