Yes I was following that this was the section you meant :) But still thought that the items you mentioned are not necessarily wanted / required by all users.Don't get me wrong, I utilise both the ideas you listed, but have also dealt with others that prefer to keepthings simple and use the standard defaults. Each to their own and all that :) Cheersgrail
> From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:33:08 -0500 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Clfs-dev] Boot Method rather than chroot steps of the > Cross-LFS book > > > On Aug 13, 2012, at 20:02 PM, Grail Dane wrote: > > > Hi William > > > > I think I follow what you are saying but wouldn't this be better > > left to CBLFS? > > The boot method is booting the temp system to build the final system. > So no. What I'm discussing is the boot method rather than chroot. > CBLFS is past > the final system. > > Example: > > http://cross-lfs.org/view/svn/ppc/boot/introduction.html this section > > Sincerely, > > William Harrington > > _______________________________________________ > Clfs-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
_______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
