On 19/08/12 21:09, William Harrington wrote:
Hello,


I'm fixing some udev issues and in the future we will be removing glib from the final system and updating to pkg-config 0.27 lite which uses a glib snippet so then we will not have to install glib for pkg-config anymore.

I've been using pkgconf for the last month and couple of builds with no problems what so ever. download at http://nenolod.net/~nenolod/distfiles <http://nenolod.net/%7Enenolod/distfiles/>
Only a symlink needed to make it behave like pkg-config

UDEV: For udev the book was missing some options and so the bootscripts would not work with it properly:

had no problems but i have a standard setup nothing exotic, have modified the bootscripts to take into account the /run and /dev (mounted as devtmpfs file system) and a few minor niggles with telling it not to clean the tmp file system, as it's just temporary
Before, udev would install libs in /libexec and gudev would be enabled and we were missing the generate rules for network and cdrom persistent links.

still don't understand why in the pure 64 build there still is references to tools/lib64 in several places

I have updated my working copy of the book but I want to make sure all looks good before I commit such a major change. I have tested with my powerpc build which I'm performing some changes, such as removing glib and adding pkg-config 0.27 lite. I've verified the common udev.xml for 32 bit builds work, but I haven't checked the multilib, and pure64 bit builds of udev. I also haven't checked the boot section for udev, but when I used the boot method to build my final-system with powerpc, I didn't have any issues.

i've updated to gcc-4.7.1 and eglibc-2.16 combo with some upgraded packages(newer versions)
Here is the link to my rendered working copy of the book.

http://cross-lfs.org/~kb0iic/cross-lfs/html/

Please look at the final system udev instructions for 32 bit, multilib and pure64 and help me make sure they are consistent and proper for each build before I do a commit like this to something major such as udev.

Sincerely,

William Harrington
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org



Regards


Martin Ward
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org

Reply via email to