On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:48:42 -0800 Jasmine Iwanek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013-02-05 20:23, [email protected] wrote: > > From: kanj <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml > > b/BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml > > index 5b6bf54..4484f0d 100644 > > --- a/BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml > > +++ b/BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml > > @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/usr/src/* > > rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/usr/include > > rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/usr/man > > rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/usr/share/man > > -rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/build</userinput></screen> > > +rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/build > > +rm -rfv ${CLFS}/sources</userinput></screen> > > > > <para>Remove the static libaries:</para> > > Not to be overly whiny or anything, but why exactly do you have an > adver-spam link in your signature? I don't think the submitter has control over that. The ISP at mybluelight.com seems to be a budget one which may insert the sig even if the customer doesn't want it. Don't worry, the sig won't make it into the patch when applied. Thanks, Andrew _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
