|
On 07/03/2013 11:32 PM, Andrew Bradford
wrote:
LFS itself is under MIT and a CC license As it is dual-licensed, one of which is MIT which permits sublicensing w/o restriction, your argument is invalid. This is why non-copyleft licenses are horrible and stupid for software. Using them dramatically increases the chance of forking. Although such licenses guarantee that your contribution to the covered work can be shared and modified by others, it says nothing about others sharing their work back with you. Don't use them. --
 |
_______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
