On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, at 08:15 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > I've not done any testing yet but I have a branch that uses EGLIBC > instead of uClibc for the embedded book. If anyone wants to give it a > whirl and let me know what issues you find, that'd be awesome! > > I'll be doing some testing real soon now. > > https://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded/tree/eglibc-n-headers
So I'm giving up on EGLIBC or glibc. They're both huge and that's not really in line with the goals of the embedded book. For now uClibc makes the most sense but I'm not completely ruling out musl-libc until I try it at least once. But my glibc adventure did lead to a few findings that'll make their way into the embedded book real soon now, mainly about keeping headers out of the target and a few other cleanups. Thanks for the testing help and assistance on IRC! :) -Andrew _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
