On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:08:48AM +0200, Stef Bon wrote:
> 
> 1. My LFS/BLFS system does run on the new architecture x86_64. What are the 
> benefits
> of a CLFS system (with comparable capability). Is it faster? If yes, then how 
> big is this in percentage?
> If it is something like 5%, I will probably not switch. If it is 15% or more 
> it's something else.
> 
 For x86_64, ISTR 3% was the sort of improvement I was seeing on _my_
benchmarks when I ran them perhaps 3 years ago (ogg encoding, image
manipulation with ImageMagick, that sort of thing).  Tests with the
built-in benchmarks of openssh looked rather more impressive on some
of the tests, I think.  If it was a 15% improvement, _everybody_ would
have switched.  If you have 4GB of physical memory, x86_64 gives you a
large userspace memory without needing 'highmem' (32-bit userspace is
limited to perhaps 3GB without highmem, depending on the motherboard),
or so they tell me - I find 2GB total memory adequate.

 What really matters is "this one goes up to 64" :)

> 2. When I look to the CLFS and the CBLFS (http://cblfs.cross-lfs.org) pages I 
> see  that the building of 32 and
> 64 bits are described. On CBLFS I see three different types: 32 bits, N32 and 
> 64bits. What about them? Can someone
> explain the differences. 

 If you are still interested, look at the x86_64 books - n32 doesn't
apply, it's for mips.
> 
> Do I have to choose one?

 You have to choose between x86, x86_64-64 ('pure64' - the build is
not so very different from 32-bit), x86_64 (multilib - all the
libraries in CLFS get built in both sizes, and working out what you
need for the desktop is interesting the first time you do it, but
you do get to use 32-bit browser plugins if you want to).  Oh, and
if you use binary graphics drivers, pure64 will probably not fit
very well with them.  For x86, we are usually a little nearer the
sharp edge than LFS (but we haven't changed very much recently, and
we don't -officially- do UTF-8, although all of my recent builds use
that).

> 
> BTW the website/documentation looks very good (apart from the missing FAQS)
> 
 But, there haven't been enough people here to ask *anything*
Frequently ;)

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support

Reply via email to