On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:03:40PM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
>  I just started another attempt to build for ppc64, using the
> 20071030 book.  And didn't get very far at all - binutils tried to
> use x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar and tried to find it (yeah, I'm building
> from x86_64 multilib).
 To make sense of that, it should say: 'binutils tried to use
x86_64-pc-linux-ar and failed to find it'.

 So much for my proof-reading.
> 
>  This is the first part of the cross-compile, so far all I've built
> are the headers and 'file').  At this stage, the only variant of
> 'ar' is just plain 'ar'.  The really strange thing is that
> 'configure' tested for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar and didn't find it,
> then later decided it was indeed there.  Looking at the _main_
> config.log, I can see
> 
> configure:6295: checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar
> configure:6324: result: no
> 
>  but then at the end
> AR='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar'
> AR_FOR_TARGET='powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ar'
> 
>  which means that when configure runs in a subdirectory it finds
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar.
> 
>  I don't understand how this can work, unless for some strange
> reason only x86_64 hosts are affected.  Maybe I'm missing something
> obvious.
> 
> ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support

Reply via email to