On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:06 PM, William Harrington <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2012, at 4:38 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > Both have toolchains that are newer than the > recommended versions... > > > I'd recommend CLFS dev and not 1.2.0 as dev has been pretty stable for half > a year or more and is about to be released. We are in a package freeze. > Builds have been successful, and ironing out some arch specific issues like
OK, will try that. > internet for any issues that you will encounter. I have an updated lfs > livecd you can use , and I use it to build CLFS dev builds just fine. It ill > build 1.0.0 and 1.2.0 just fine. > > http://cross-lfs.org/~kb0iic/livecdupd/ > Great. I'll extract the rootfs and use as host. Thanks Jorge Almeida _______________________________________________ Clfs-support mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-support-cross-lfs.org
