On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 5:58 PM, William Harrington <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > I did find something that may hint at the issue > https://www.illumos.org/issues/2534 > > When there are failures, it is best to compare with the logs and then decide > if you wish to move on. > I'd move on. This may never get fixed with gcc or gmp. > The target is the same as the host (i686). The only reason I'm trying clfs rather than lfs is to take advantage of eglibc to produce static binaries smaller (one hopes) than with glibc.
Is it safe to proceed with the other packages, in spite of the book's warning? Thanks Jorge Almeida _______________________________________________ Clfs-support mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-support-cross-lfs.org
