At 07:59 AM 10/7/2004, Yussef Alkhamrichi wrote: >Hi Guys, > >I've no idea if anyone is using httpd CLI yet, I wanted to inform about its >use. I think it is a great project combining the .NET Framework (and myabe >mono) and Apache. I have developed in C# for the last 3 years, everything from >windows apps, services and websites.
Glad you are here, glad you gave it a spin :) >I've pulled a version from the subversion repository a couple of weeks ago and >got it compiled and running with two minor changes. > >Changed > >if (!repl || wcscmp(repl, L"\\apache.exe")) > >into > >if (!repl || !wcscmp(repl, L"\\apache.exe")) I'm removing the later test - it was both a path check and a look for a proprietary flavor of the httpd.exe binary. The test for (!repl) is sufficient, since we don't care if they name the Apache binary as httpd.exe, apache.exe or something else. >and changed the PublicKeyToken refrence on line 329 of mod/mod_aspdotnet.cpp >to match the assembly. Also committed, thanks. There is one interesting consideration... do we want two separate keys, one dev key (the one in there now) used by anyone who builds this package themselves (unless, if they would like they can create their own) ... and the other used for official binary release (and held by the release manager alone)? >I've stress tested it quickly, the strange thing was that the req/sec were >lower than on IIS but the throughput in mb/sec was higher. I haven't looked >any further, but to bad the number of requests is lower than with IIS. Maybe I >missed a Apache configurational setting or this will be improved in feature >releases. IIS uses fibers (smaller than threads) and can internally cache its results. (The mod_cache code -is- improving radically, I expect you can get similar results with this environment.) I'd be most interested if you were handing off requests serially, or were testing load against 10 or 100 parallel clients. ab.exe distributed with Apache allows you to specific -c 10 for 10 concurrent requests, etc. >Does anyone have experiences with the perfomance of this module ? (Maybe it's >the wrong place to ask it on this mailing list, sorry for that) Due to Microsoft's license terms of IIS, etc, Covalent never published or made claims to the performance of this module when it was developed. Remember too - the first request will be slower while the assembly module is first loaded, and compiled from IL to the native code cache. Bill
