At 02:06 AM 11/24/2004, Yussef Alkhamrichi wrote:
>>Just looking for quick input.  Most of the patches floating
>>out there should now be committed.  We need to address the
>>double-loading of aspnetmount's.  And load any .NET version
>>by explicit name (e.g. even the 2.0 beta versions, whichever,
>>by their version and signature.)
>>
>>Other than coming up with those two patches, can anyone point
>>at some patch I've missed before I throw together the next
>>candidate?
>
>Those are the only two major points I can come up with right now so I'm fine 
>with these.
>
>One small question: I've never been following OSS release procedures so 
>closely, will the next release candidate be a tagged version of the trunk? I'm 
>asking this because I wanted to know if the Server String decoration commited 
>in revision 106107 will be in this next release candidate, this would surely 
>be nice :)

I intend to grab all changes to cvs HEAD.  If anyone hollers,
we can back out one or two changes between the candidate, and
the final release tarball, if any patch introduced a regression.

Bill



Reply via email to