At 11:10 AM 11/29/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >At 03:09 PM 11/28/2004, Jeff White wrote: > >mod_aspdotnet serves one very specific purpose, to serve ASP.NET >content from httpd on Win32. Nothing more nothing less. > >>Should there or could there be: >> >>mod_aspdotnet1.so CPP that loads an assembly only >>(allowing C# or VB.NET or any of the 50+ languages for source code >>adjustments) > >Please - not mod_aspdotnet1 - why not simply mod_dotnet.so? > >That is a direction we are all thinking of moving in. > >We can keep extending mod_dotnet, if it is sufficiently broad >in scope. It would -not- serve ASP.NET - it would be for loading >.NET code into Apache-space. (And yes - no issue with running >both modules.)
Let me point out one amusing aspect. If the security was enabled to allow the .NET managed space to instance System.Web.Hosting, then yes, you could implement ASP.NET as a pure .NET solution :) Bill
