DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33880>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33880 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-08 20:18 ------- By default in IIS all ASP.Net associated extensions DO NOT have to exist in order for their requests to be passed to the asp.net "module". I was only making the suggestion because in IIS it is up the server on a per extension basis to determine whether a file must exist before the request can be passed to the "module". I don't know if there is a equivalent feature in Apache. It seems to me that unlike the IIS "module" the Apache variant is making the decision that the file MUST exist instead of this being a server decision. If the module is taking this responsibility I figured that it should mimic IIS's per extension file exist check. Thus, I could say that ‘aspx’ files must exist while ‘mycustomextension’ files do not. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.