> My understanding is that GAE only supports JPA and JDO (no jdbc) so we'll > have to port Cayenne to JPA to host the examples there.
(Just thinking out load ...) Cayenne had made a push to support a JPA provider in Cayenne 3.0, but that work was abandoned. * http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/guide-to-30-features.html Would the notion of a GAE adapter for Cayenne make any sense. Instead of talking to Derby or HSQLDB, it would talk to JPA or JDO. Of course, the big fix, would be to abstract Cayenne so that Click could talk to Cayenne or a JPA provider (espeically since there won't be JPA in C3). But, I expect that would be a lot of work. > If Cayenne is using an in memory database, does GAE care? Using HSQLDB in memory is an interesting idea, so long as there isn't a GAE/J ceiling on RAM. (It's also something we can test in isolation.) RAM is not listed specifically as a resource http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dLfQMJsmsaI/SUg3NOeljVI/AAAAAAAAACA/Yh0ug378x6g/s1600-h/billing-blog-post-100percent.png and of course, the notion has been around for a long time http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-memory_database (Though, I'd feel better if HSQLDB was backed up as a blob of something in the real datastorage area.) -Ted. On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Bob Schellink<[email protected]> wrote: > Malcolm Edgar wrote: >> >> OK, so long was we can resolve CLK-564 in an RC2 release. >> >> We could probably host Click examples on GAE with this and the GAE work > > > My understanding is that GAE only supports JPA and JDO (no jdbc) so we'll > have to port Cayenne to JPA to host the examples there. > > bob > >
