Ted Husted wrote:
I've had a chance to go through the (truly excellent) documentation,
and, from a mentor perspective came up with a few notes.
[Click versus Apache Click]
Ideally, we should sprinkle in more references to "Apache Click" to
reinforce the branding. Typically, we would want to refer Apache Click
at the beginning of major section, and then reduce that to Click later
on.
Will fix for the next release.
[blog]
Ideally, we should open up an account at blogs.apache.org, and start
posting blog entries there instead.
Didn't know about Apache's blog. I'll open a JIRA as indicated in Gavin's mail.
[friends of click]
The ASF has some top-level sponsors, and we shouldn't dilute their
support by overusing the word sponsor. In reference to the last
section of Click Online, I'd suggest taking a look at what Jackrabbit
does with their "Thanks" links.
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/
OK, in the meantime I've removed sponsors from the website.
My only real concern was with YourKit (I use it frequently to gauge Click's
performance)
but I notice JackRabbit provides attribution to them as well, so we'll do the
same.
After that, and the other changes Bob indicated elsewhere, I think we
should consider applying for graduation from the incubator. There will
always be more to do on the code-side, but from a community and
packaging perspective, Apache Click seems (more than) ready to rock.
We actually attempted for graduation back in April. Discussion can be found here[1]. In the end it
was decided that we need a bit more time to expand our committer base.
kind regards
bob
[1]: http://markmail.org/thread/f6h3mjixjdgsnh43
