Yes it could be, also org.apache.click.extras.builder could be a good package name. The thing that worries me about util, is that people may not find it, and it can become a bit of a dumping ground for odds and ends.
regards Malcolm Edgar On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Adrian A.<[email protected]> wrote: >> Another feature I would like to see in 2.1.0 is the builder pattern. >> With a class for creating forms and another for creating tables, does >> anyone want to have a crack at this? > > Yes. I'll try a first version and send a patch for the two classes you > mention. > >> org.apache.click.extras.control.FormBuilder >> org.apache.click.extras.control.TableBuilder > > Wouldn't org.apache.click.extras.util.* be a better package (since the above > classes are not controls)? > > Adrian. > >
