Hi Malcolm,
I've updated the TOC to reflect the layout below. Let me know of any issues.
kind regards
bob
Malcolm Edgar wrote:
Unfortunately didn't finish that email properly, and hit the send
button. I would probably prefer a navigation layout somewhat closer to
the previous revision.
With the Thanks page links and attribution could we include these as
references in the Community "Who Are We" page.
How about this navigation structure:
Click
+ Who We Are
+ User Guide
+ Developer Guide
+ Quick Start Guide
+ FAQ
+ Cheat Sheet
+ Roadmap and Changes
Javadoc
+ Click API
+ Extras API
+ Mock API
Click Online
+ Examples
+ Extension Projects
+ Mail Lists
+ Issue Tracker
+ Downloads
Click IDE
+ Roadmap & Changes
+ Downloads
References
+ Velocity
+ HTML
+ CSS
+ Servlet API
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Malcolm Edgar<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Bob,
Great to see the "Who We Are" page in the documentation, I was hoping
to have a crack at doing that but you beat me too it which is good,
considering how much time I seem to have currently. With the list of
persons I would recommend sorting them alpabetically.
I like the new navigation buttons on the home page, I would reduce
their size a little however.
Many of the new navigation page changes I am page items I don't like
many of the layout changes. Using the site for work, I rely heavily on
the reference content such as Javadoc APIs, Velocity andso I would
prefer these remain top level elements. I appreciate we are juggling
space here.
Could some of the Thanks page links and attributetion please
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Bob Schellink<[email protected]> wrote:
Just a quick note about some changes I made to the site which includes
attribution and who-we-are pages. Since the site caters for a 1024x768
screen size I had to fold certain TOC nodes into their parent node: Javadoc,
Velocity and References.
bob
