sabob wrote: > > > I think we should enhance FileField to better handle this mapping. One > issue > might be that blobs uses byte[] or InputStream while clobs uses char[] or > Reader. Perhaps we should change FileField so one can specify the type of > the > data, ala HiddenField. > >
Then again such a change might create confusion because by default FileField.getValueObject returns the value of the field, in this case the name of the file that was uploaded, not the *content* of the file. bob Steve Wells wrote: > Hi all, > > I've only just begun using Click and so far it looks like a winner, well > done guys on a simple and effective framework. Finally things are > starting to look they way they should for the end-user developer! It > takes me way back to my Delphi days. > > As a Cayenne user one of the most appealing facets was the slick > integration between the 2 frameworks. > > I have hit my first snag trying to use a FileField that links > automagically to a Cayenne object field of type byte[] (db is BLOB). > The field displays fine but as it is a Cayenne mandatory the commit > fails with a Cayenne validation exception; it looks like the screen > field is not wired to the Cayenne field. > > Is my approach wrong? > > Thank you, > > Steve > > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/CayenneForm-and-FileField-tp3359910p3361110.html Sent from the click-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
