The problem with the programming manual is that parts of it are out of date. The doxygen documentation is to be preferred to the programming manual where they both cover some subject. The intention was to replace the programming manual with doxygen documentation plus perhaps a higher-level overview. So what parts do you really miss in the programming manual?
Eddie Bart Braem wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a reason the programming manual is not referenced at the wiki? > We know a part of its contents is in the doxygen documentation but it's > certainly not entirely there. > We ask this because we are updating our student documentation (which is > freely > available at our website). We feel that our students need such a manual to > understand the mechanisms behind some specific parts of Click, to allow them > to program well. > > Regards, > Bart > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > click mailing list > click@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu > https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click _______________________________________________ click mailing list click@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
