Hi Mike, I checked in an update so UDPIPEncap also takes DST_ANNO. Thanks!
Eddie Mike Wilson wrote: > Can we do the same thing with UDPIPEncap? (Does it just pass through > automatically to IPEncap?) > > -Mike Wilson > > On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Eddie Kohler wrote: > >> Hi Yi, >> >> I've just checked in an update to IPEncap that allows you to set its DST >> argument to the string "DST_ANNO". In this case, the element will set >> the destination address to the destination address annotation's current >> value. >> >> As a bonus, IPEncap should be a bit faster now since it precalculates >> most of the checksum. >> >> Thanks for your patience, >> Eddie >> >> >> Yi Wang wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Is there an efficient way to do dynamic IP-in-IP encapsulation in Click, >>> e.g., after a packet passes through a IPRouteTable, encapsulate it with >>> the new destination address set to the dst address in the annotation. >>> >>> It seems to me that the IPEncap only does static encapsulation. Does it >>> mean that I need to do some hack to do dynamic IP-in-IP encapsulation? >>> One such way may be to add a new IP header to packets before they enter >>> the IPRouteTable, and rewrite the outer destination address using the >>> annotation after the lookup. But I was wondering if there is better way >>> to do this. >>> >>> Thanks a lot in advance. >>> >>> Yi >>> _______________________________________________ >>> click mailing list >>> click@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu >>> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click >> _______________________________________________ >> click mailing list >> click@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu >> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click >> _______________________________________________ click mailing list click@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
