Hi Fadjar, I thougth that the behaviour of LinkUnqueue element is a delay (like a DelayShaper element) and then fix the BW (like a BandwidthShaper), then my new configuration would be:
RatedSource() -> DynamicUDPIPEncap() -> EtherEncap() -> Queue -> DelayShaper -> BandwidthShaper -> ToDevice() thus I will not have more problems with the push-pull. Also, I have thougth to change the ToDevice element by ToHost element (i work with tun interfaces) greetings and thanks (from sunny Spain) Maria Gómez > Subject: Re: [Click] Link Simulation > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:12:19 +0700 > > Dear Maria, > > LinkUnqueue just change the pull output to push output that not fit with > ToDevice element. > There are nothing to do with DelayShaper or BandwidthShaper. > > Regards, > Fadjar T > > On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 19:47 +0000, María Gómez wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Are equivalent the LinkUnqueue element and (DelayShaper + BandwidthShaper)? > > > > My configuration: > > > > RatedSource() -> DynamicUDPIPEncap() -> EtherEncap() -> Queue -> > > LinkUnqueue() -> ToDevice() > > > > Error: LinkUnqueue push output -- pull input ToDevice > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > ¿Quieres ver los mejores videos de MSN? Enciende Messenger TV > > http://messengertv.msn.com/mkt/es-es/default.htm > > _______________________________________________ > > click mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click > -- > Regards, > Fadjar Tandabawana > TST Indonesia _________________________________________________________________ Chatea sin límites en Messenger con la tarifa plana de Orange http://serviciosmoviles.es.msn.com/messenger/orange.aspx _______________________________________________ click mailing list [email protected] https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
