> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.desktop` directory, and accepted those 
> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
> 
> I ignored typos in public methods and variables. Maybe they can be fixed 
> later on without much fanfare, if they are in internal classes. Typos in 
> exposed APIs are likely here to stay.
> 
> I will update copyright years using a script before pushing (otherwise like 
> every second change would be a copyright update, making reviewing much 
> harder).
> 
> The long term goal here is to make tooling support for running `codespell`. 
> The trouble with automating this is of course all false positives. But before 
> even trying to solve that issue, all true positives must be fixed. Hence this 
> PR.

Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with two 
additional commits since the last revision:

 - Revert changes to glext.h
 - Revert changes to multiVis.c and wsutils.h

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/8328/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/8328/files/1ce28314..e9f67a30

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=8328&range=08
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=8328&range=07-08

  Stats: 10 lines in 3 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 10 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/8328.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/8328/head:pull/8328

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/8328

Reply via email to