On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 22:54:30 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> But I assume we should have a test somewhere that validates that this option > is not null = "is not optional"? Maybe core libs could add such a test. The link doesn't work for me but I expect I'd need to look at each of those cases to understand what they are doing. It doesn't change that the reason for this proposed change isn't valid. We probably should remove that debugging property to make it clear. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11559
