On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:49:24 GMT, Julian Waters <jwat...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> On Windows, the basic Java Integer types are defined as long and __int64
>> respectively. In particular, the former is rather problematic since it
>> breaks compilation as the Visual C++ becomes stricter and more compliant
>> with every release, which means the way Windows code treats long as a
>> typedef for int is no longer correct, especially with -permissive- enabled.
>> Instead of changing every piece of broken code to match the jint = long
>> typedef, which is far too time consuming, we can instead change jint to an
>> int (which is still the same 32 bit number type as long), as there are far
>> fewer problems caused by this definition. It's better to get this over and
>> done with sooner than later when a future version of Visual C++ finally
>> starts to break on existing code
>
> Julian Waters has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Fix the code that is actually warning
src/jdk.accessibility/windows/native/jaccesswalker/jaccesswalker.cpp line 475:
> 473: topLevelWindow = hwnd;
> 474: } else {
> 475: EnumChildWindows(hwnd, (WNDENUMPROC) EnumChildProc, nullptr);
Did you try to compile this?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14125#discussion_r1236688830
