On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 07:40:11 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> After looking at the build results of a jdk22 build on RHEL 8.4 Linux >> ppc64le that uses a ppc64le-linux-gnu-to-ppc64le-linux-gnu-fedora27-gcc11.3.0 >> devkit we observed those unwanted paths in libsplashscreen.so . >> See those objdump and ldd output : >> >> objdump -x ./lib/libsplashscreen.so | grep PATH >> RUNPATH >> /mydevkitsfolder/devkits/ppc64le-linux-gnu-to-ppc64le-linux-gnu-fedora27-gcc11.3.0/ppc64le-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/lib64:$ORIGIN >> >> >> ldd ./lib/libsplashscreen.so >> ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for >> `./lib/libsplashscreen.so' >> . . . >> libX11.so.6 => >> /mydevkitsfolder/devkits/ppc64le-linux-gnu-to-ppc64le-linux-gnu-fedora27-gcc11.3.0/ppc64le-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/lib64/libX11.so.6 >> (0x00007fffa3920000) >> libXext.so.6 => >> /mydevkitsfolder/devkits/ppc64le-linux-gnu-to-ppc64le-linux-gnu-fedora27-gcc11.3.0/ppc64le-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/lib64/libXext.so.6 >> (0x00007fffa38e0000) >> . . . >> >> These paths were introduced by the '-R' setting, but it seems to be highly >> dependent on the environment. But the '-R' setting should better be avoided >> anyway when the devkit is used. > > Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > with_x case needs to be handled Hi Erik, thanks for the review ! ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15534#issuecomment-1706556893
