On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:12:14 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> What purpose does this distinction serve? >> >> Definitely an application developer and because it's the context of this >> HTML implementation, may I preserve this distinction ? >> >>> This actually raises another question: what if altAtt isn't provided? >>> Should it fallback to srcURL? >> >> Yes, it's a logical error on my part. > >> > What purpose does this distinction serve? >> >> Definitely an application developer and because it's the context of this >> HTML implementation, may I preserve this distinction ? > > Okay, let it be. However, I still think it's not the right thing. > > There was nothing else but the `src` attribute, now there is. > >> > This actually raises another question: what if altAtt isn't provided? >> > Should it fallback to srcURL? >> >> Yes, it's a logical error on my part. > > Are you going to address it?  <html> <body> <input type=image name=point src="file:oracle_logo_50x50.jpg" alt="Logo Oracle JPG"> <p> <input type=image name=point src="file:oracle_logo_50x50.jpg"> <p> <input type=image name=point src="file:none_oracle_logo_50x50.jpg" alt="Logo Oracle JPG"> <p> <input type=image name=point src="file:none_oracle_logo_50x50.jpg"> <p> <input type=image name=point src="files:none_oracle_logo_50x50.jpg" alt="Logo Oracle JPG"> <p> <input type=image name=point src="files:none_oracle_logo_50x50.jpg"> <p> </body> </html> - Left before the Patch - Right with your suggestion and if the distinction is preserved. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15319#discussion_r1370696319
