On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 17:12:07 GMT, Phil Race <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Julian Waters has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Part II awt_PrintJob.cpp
>
> PS, yes the A11Y changes are OK.

@prrace By the way, how outdated is the comment that awt.dll should not rely on 
msvcp.dll? As far as I can tell we now always distribute msvcp.dll in the JDK, 
and it would help a lot if I could use the C++ Standard Library for this. Or 
could I statically link the CRT into awt.dll instead, if awt.dll really should 
not rely on msvcp.dll?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15096#issuecomment-1794052639

Reply via email to