On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:34:05 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhuk...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

> Test failed with the exception java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: (start <= 
> value <= end) with no history of failing till date.
> Investigation shows SpinnerDateModel constructor condition is not satisfied 
> because
> It seems it's a leap year problem that is being manifested..
> 
> As per test,
> initDate Thu Feb 29 13:49:08 IST 2024 [ obtained by calendar.getTime();]
> earliestDate Tue Feb 28 13:49:08 IST 2023 [obtained by 
> calendar.add(Calendar.YEAR, -1);]
> latestDate Wed Feb 28 13:49:08 IST 2024 [obtained by 
> calendar.add(Calendar.YEAR, 1);]
> 
> Now, as per SpinnerDateModel constructor
> earliestDate <= initDate condition is satisfied
> but
> latestDate >= initDate is not
> so [start <= value <= 
> end](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/998d0baab0fd051c38d9fd6021628eb863b80554/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/SpinnerDateModel.java#L185)
>  condition fails
> 
> Not sure it anything can be done in Calendar class for this but fix is done 
> in test taking leapyear into account so that we add a day if it's a leapyear 
> when we consecutively do Calendar.add(YEAR, -1) and Calendar.add(YEAR,1) on 
> leapyear date of 29Feb

Surely this just needs a one line fix
<pre>
diff --git a/test/jdk/javax/swing/JSpinner/8008657/bug8008657.java 
b/test/jdk/javax/swing/JSpinner/8008657/bug8008657.java
index cbeb0c185bb..49918278e34 100644
--- a/test/jdk/javax/swing/JSpinner/8008657/bug8008657.java
+++ b/test/jdk/javax/swing/JSpinner/8008657/bug8008657.java
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static void createDateSpinner() {
         calendar.add(Calendar.YEAR, -1);
         Date earliestDate = calendar.getTime();
         calendar.add(Calendar.YEAR, 1);
+        calendar.add(Calendar.DAY_OF_MONTH, 1);
         Date latestDate = calendar.getTime();
         SpinnerModel dateModel = new SpinnerDateModel(initDate,
                 earliestDate,
</pre>

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18054#issuecomment-1971912446

Reply via email to