On Tue, 20 May 2025 22:09:37 GMT, Phil Race <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Update the some code examples and accompanying images to no longer mention
>> or display as applets.
>
> Phil Race has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 8357176
I still have some minor nits.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/BorderLayout.java line 102:
> 100: * The code for this program is as follows:
> 101: *
> 102: * <hr>
Suggestion:
Drop the horizontal line. It separates the code from the paragraph that
introduces it.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/BorderLayout.java line 115:
> 113: * EventQueue.invokeAndWait(() -> {
> 114: * Frame frame = new Frame("BorderLayout");
> 115: * frame.setLayout(new BorderLayout());
Suggestion:
* public class BorderLayoutExample {
*
* public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
* EventQueue.invokeAndWait(() -> {
* Frame frame = new Frame("BorderLayout");
* frame.setLayout(new BorderLayout());
I suggest following the standard indentation of 4 spaces to align with the
recommended Java code style and dropping the blank line inside the `main`
method.
Is there any particular reason for using `invokeAndWait` instead of
`invokeLater`? Most Java UI tutorials use `invokeLater`.
(In the tests, we have to use `invokeAndWait`.)
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/FlowLayout.java line 63:
> 61: * Here is the code for this program:
> 62: *
> 63: * <hr>
Suggestion:
I suggest dropping the horizontal line from all the sample code.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/FlowLayout.java line 64:
> 62: *
> 63: * <hr>
> 64: * {@snippet lang='java':
Suggestion:
* {@snippet lang='java':
Not really an issue, however, other instances have just one space.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/FlowLayout.java line 75:
> 73: *
> 74: * EventQueue.invokeAndWait(() -> {
> 75: * Frame frame = new Frame("FlowLayout");
The same comment: let's follow the standard Java code style and indent blocks
by 4 spaces.
Here, the `main` method declaration and `EventQueue.invokeAndWait` are indented
by 2 spaces, but the body of the lambda expression is indented by 4 spaces.
This is inconsistent.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/GridBagLayout.java line 279:
> 277: * Here is the code that implements the example shown above:
> 278: *
> 279: * <hr>
Suggestion:
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/GridBagLayout.java line 287:
> 285: * import java.awt.GridBagLayout;
> 286: *
> 287: * public class GridBagLayoutExample {
This sample indents each code block by 4 spaces, which is good.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/GridLayout.java line 40:
> 38: * <hr>
> 39: * {@snippet lang='java':
> 40: * <pre>
Suggestion:
* {@snippet lang='java':
`<pre>` is inside the sample code.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/GridLayout.java line 51:
> 49: *
> 50: * EventQueue.invokeAndWait(() -> {
> 51: * Frame frame = new Frame("GridLayout");
Let's indent the code by 4 spaces.
I'm also for removing the blank line that starts the `main` method.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/MediaTracker.java line 70:
> 68: * Here is an example of using {@code MediaTracker}:
> 69: *
> 70: * <hr>
Suggestion:
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/MediaTracker.java line 117:
> 115: * animator = new Thread(this);
> 116: * animator.start();
> 117: * }
Suggestion:
* }
Correct the indentation.
-------------
Changes requested by aivanov (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#pullrequestreview-2858047334
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100501264
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100498882
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100697034
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100714553
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100701896
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100705020
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100707123
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100683735
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100712282
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100712613
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25278#discussion_r2100718917
