On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:11:03 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I am not *expecting* it to be called twice. I'm just saying that with this >> check it would be safe if it were. >> Not sure I even need synchronization here. Only the Disposer will have a >> reference. >> So I could remove synchronized, remove the != 0 check ... but I don't see a >> problem either way. > > That would be great if we could drop all unneeded code. I removed the != 0 and the synchronized modifier ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26331#discussion_r2211591459
