On Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:52:52 GMT, Phil Race <[email protected]> wrote:

>> This fix updates DataBuffer subclasses to actually adhere to their stated 
>> specifications by rejecting certain invalid parameters for constructors and 
>> getters and setters.
>> A new egression test for each of the constructor and getter/setter cases is 
>> supplied.
>> 
>> No existing regression tests fail with this change, and standard demos work.
>> 
>> Problems caused by these changes are most likely to occur if the client has 
>> a bug such that 
>> - a client uses the constructors that accept an array and then supplies a 
>> "size" that is greater than the array.
>> - a client uses the constructors that accept an array and then supplies a 
>> "size" that is less than the array and then uses getter/setters that are 
>> within the array but outside the range specified by size. 
>> 
>> Since very few clients (and just one case in the JDK that I found) even use 
>> these array constructors the changes are unlikely to make a difference to 
>> clients.
>> 
>> The CSR is ready for review https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8378116
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Phil Race has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8377568

src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/DataBuffer.java line 632:

> 630:             throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException("Invalid index 
> (offsets[" + bank + "]+i) is " +
> 631:                 "(" + offsets[bank] + " + " + i + ") which is too large 
> for size : " + size);
> 632:         }

The condition here should be `(i + offsets[bank] >= size)`.

src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/DataBuffer.java line 632:

> 630:             throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException("Invalid index 
> (offsets[" + bank + "]+i) is " +
> 631:                 "(" + offsets[bank] + " + " + i + ") which is too large 
> for size : " + size);
> 632:         }

I wonder whether the messages in the exceptions should use `getOffset()` or 
`getOffsets()` instead of member variables `offset` and `offsets`.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29766#discussion_r3155534546
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29766#discussion_r3155542213

Reply via email to