On 6 Okt., 10:34, James Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 6, 4:21 am, Hans Hübner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > for a project, I would like to use a Java framework that exposes a > > very Javaesque API, with dozens of classes that need to be > > instantiated or used and with several interfaces that one needs to > > implement in order to be called back by the framework. > > ... > > How do others approach this kind of problem? Are you just ignoring > > the functional vs. object oriented mismatch and access Java objects > > from everywhere? Do you use hand-written wrappers around the > > libraries? Tools? > > I don't think there's any one answer to this, as it really depends on > the library.
Certainly so - I am not looking for all-for-one solutions, but I would like to learn what others think about this and how they handle the functional/object-oriented mismatch. To me, this is a little ironic as I have spent a good portion of my professional life writing object wrappers around functional APIs, and now suddenly I need to do it the other way round :) > I've written a functional wrapper around the Java servlet > interface, and I use a number of techniques. Which API in particular > are you trying to convert? The API I am working with is xlightweb, an asynchronous HTTP client/ server framework based on xSocket. API docs are at http://xlightweb.sourceforge.net/core/apidocs/2_1/ Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, -Hans --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
