On Oct 19, 3:02 pm, Achim Passen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> user> (= #{1 4} #{2 3})
Fixed - thanks for the report.
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- Bug? Strange set equality (r1075) Achim Passen
- Re: Bug? Strange set equality (r1075) Chouser
- Re: Bug? Strange set equality (r1075) Rich Hickey
- Re: Bug? Strange set equality (r1075) Stephen C. Gilardi
- Re: Bug? Strange set equality (r1075) J. McConnell
- Testing Clojure (was Re: Bug? Strange set ... Stephen C. Gilardi
- Re: Testing Clojure (was Re: Bug? Stra... Paul Barry
- Re: Testing Clojure (was Re: Bug?... Michael Beauregard
- Re: Testing Clojure (was Re: Bug? Stra... J. McConnell
- Re: Testing Clojure (was Re: Bug? Stra... J. McConnell
- Re: Testing Clojure (was Re: Bug?... Stephen C. Gilardi
- Re: Testing Clojure (was Re: ... J. McConnell
- Re: Testing Clojure (was Re: Bug? Stra... Stuart Halloway
