On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd rather enhance doto to do this and not add another variant. The > break would be that current (doto x (foo 42)) would have to become > (doto x (.foo 42)). > > Any thoughts on this as part of the upcoming bit of breaking changes?
Under most circumstances you'd get compile errors up front, I think, and those would be simple to fix. Wouldn't bother me. --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
