Yep, I'm going that route. Thanks On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- On Sun, 11/9/08, Brian Doyle wrote: > > Yes, it is a StringBuilder so technically yes. I guess you > > since the only thing you ever do with a StringBuilder is produce a > > string it just seemed like it would be a string. Same goes for > > StringBuffer. > > I'd say create your own (stringish? ...) function then--since Clojure is > strongly Java-interop returning a T for a non-String would make (string? > ...) seem less useful, but that's just my opinion. > > Dave > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
