On Nov 24, 3:03 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > Speculating about inefficiency without a concrete counter-proposal is > not productive. While there could no doubt be some higher-performance > vector constructor/reducers, producing vector-returning versions of > the sequence ops is not generally a good idea.
You are right. I give in. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
