On Saturday 29 November 2008 07:35, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote: > On Nov 29, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > I'm somewhat confused by this, but I gather it has something to do > > with "take" being lazy? > > The last note in the doc for macroexpand explains it: > > user=> (doc macroexpand) > ------------------------- > clojure.core/macroexpand > ([form]) > Repeatedly calls macroexpand-1 on form until it no longer > represents a macro form, then returns it. Note neither > macroexpand-1 nor macroexpand expand macros in subforms. > nil > > In this first case, "for" is a subform. > > There's a nice description of going further here: > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/28837d55525306d8
OK. So it's not the laziness of "take," but rather the nature of macroexpand. Thanks for the reference. I'll review that post. > --Steve Randall Schulz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
