> >> Alternatively, could I provide a "multi- >> math" lib to redefine the core math functions? > > Type classes would be king.
Do you mean this in the Haskell sense? (I'm not too familiar with those) Or something more like Java's types? I was thinking about how to solve this problem more generally and was considering an interface, but nothing obvious came to mind. Java's lack of operator overloading makes this more difficult I think. > But at least you can use your definition : > > (ns test.test > (:refer-clojure :exclude [+ -])) > > (defn + > [a b] > 33) > > (+ 1 2) ;= 33 Thanks for the suggestion, this will give me a chance to play around with multi-method and see what I think. Cheers, -Mark --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
