On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:45 AM, J. McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Thanks. I think it does a bit too much - I only want to relax the >> requirement for namespace-qualification, not any of the other >> assertions (e.g. that the participants are either Named or Classes, >> can't be = etc). > > Right, that makes sense. I believe this new patch is closer to what > you are looking for. It moves the namespace checks for both tag and > parent to the two argument case and keeps the not=, class? or Named > checks in the three argument case. >
Patch applied (svn 1150) - thanks! Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
