On Dec 13, 8:28 am, lpetit <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I wanted to know if I was alone thinking that 'mapcat' should better > have been named 'catmap' ? > When reading code, this looks more natural because it resembles the > functional composition of the 2 functions : (cat (map ...)) > mapcat, I take to read "map, and then cat the results" -- if we're reversing the order, and breaking with older dialects, could we call it flatmap instead, like Scala?
-- Michel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
