Jim,

> I would make some minor changes in two places.  I would write with-
> monad as:

Obviously this is a better version.

> And I would write m-lift as

I like that one as well.

I have uploaded a new version that integrates your improvements.  
Another one is that the monad operations are now named functions (a  
feature I discovered by accident), which helps in debugging.

> I've also modified my parser combinator monad and uploaded a new
> version at:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/web/monad-parser%20%282%29.clj

That looks like a good opportunity to look at monadic parsers...

Konrad.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to